i just realized something about the 'facts' teachers give us these days to prove
marijuana is bad. why do they always use the fact that there are over 2000 chemicals in marijuana, but only 400 or so in tobacco? that is a little stupid IMO. because those 2000+ chemicals are naturaly
made from the plant, however the 400 chemicals in tobacco are man made
(maybe not all but there still are man made ones involved). who cares how many chemicals are in a substance, that doesnt mean every one is harmful. isn't it the factor of how harmful the chemicals are, that show how bad a substance is? i wouldnt think acetone, cadnium, hydrogen cyanide, or DDT found in tobacco is healtier than weed, now would you?
does any one else want to share something teachers/etc. try to say to prove they are correct and what not? when you know that data is just inconclusive/pointless not helping their argument at all